Skip to main content
Notable Settlement
Healthcare
$31.5 Million

Fresno Community Health System — Stark Law Violations

California Health System Pays $31.5 Million for Physician Kickbacks

By Angie KellyLast updated: May 10, 2024

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

TL;DR: California Health System Pays $31.5 Million for Physician Kickbacks This case resulted in a $31.5 Million resolution and demonstrates the impact of whistleblower protections in recovering funds from fraud.

Summary

A Fresno-based community health system and its affiliate agreed to pay $31.5 million to settle allegations that they provided improper financial inducements to referring physicians in violation of the Anti-Kickback Statute, Stark Law, and False Claims Act. DOJ alleged the health system provided referring physicians with expensive meals, alcohol, and cigars in an on-premises lounge, along with EHR technology subsidies and bonuses for alleged participation in clinical integration activities that were intended to reward referrals. The system entered a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG.

Our Take

Physician entertainment cases often hide in plain sight—"relationship building" that's really referral purchasing. Insiders typically have evidence of the entertainment spending, the physician selection criteria (tied to referral potential), any compliance objections that were overruled, and communications linking the perks to expected patient volume. If your organization has a physician "lounge" or "appreciation" program where the real currency is referrals, document how physicians are selected and what behaviors the spending is designed to incentivize.

Read the full article from the original source:

View Original Article

Opens in a new tab. Content from U.S. Department of Justice.

Notice

The summaries above are based on publicly available information released by the U.S. Department of Justice and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, investigative findings, or allegations by Disclosure Strategy. Our commentary reflects general, experience-based observations about how False Claims Act matters commonly arise and is not a statement about any party's liability.