Uniformed Services Family Health Plan — Overpayment Retention
DOJ Files Complaint Alleging $300 Million in Overpayment Retention
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
TL;DR: DOJ Files Complaint Alleging $300 Million in Overpayment Retention This case resulted in a $300+ Million (Alleged) resolution and demonstrates the impact of whistleblower protections in recovering funds from fraud.
Summary
DOJ filed a False Claims Act complaint alleging that six health plans participating in the Uniformed Services Family Health Plan (USFHP), along with their trade group, knowingly retained erroneously inflated capitation payments for healthcare services for retired service members and their families. DOJ alleged that in June 2012 the plans learned of rate-setting calculation errors that had inflated prior-year payments, yet took steps to conceal the overpayments and continued invoicing at inflated rates; DOJ also reported a related settlement with actuarial/consulting contractor Kennell & Associates tied to notification failures. In the government's complaint-in-intervention, DOJ alleged the plans were collectively overpaid by over $300 million between 2008 and 2012 (based on the plans' actuary's assessment).
Our Take
Overpayment-retention cases often begin as an internal "rate issue" or actuarial anomaly that someone flags—and then leadership choices determine whether it becomes a repayment event or a concealment problem. Insiders commonly have meeting notes with actuaries, emails about what to disclose, draft communications to the government, and internal financial modeling showing the benefit of staying silent. If you've seen a known payment error treated as a negotiation tactic rather than a compliance obligation, the most important evidence is usually contemporaneous: who knew, when they knew, and what they decided to do next.
Read the full article from the original source:
View Original ArticleOpens in a new tab. Content from U.S. Department of Justice.
Notice
The summaries above are based on publicly available information released by the U.S. Department of Justice and are provided for informational purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice, investigative findings, or allegations by Disclosure Strategy. Our commentary reflects general, experience-based observations about how False Claims Act matters commonly arise and is not a statement about any party's liability.